From: "Saved by Windows Internet Explorer 8" Subject: Your View - Potpourri Archives Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 14:26:17 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Location: http://web.archive.org/web/20021201-20051229re_/http://www.ladylibrty.com/archives_yv_potpourri.html X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.1.7600.16543 Your View - Potpourri Archives

Originally posted from = 12-08-02=20 to 12-30-02
Why They Hate Jonathan Farley - = In=20 America

by Lewis Goldberg
=

Vanderbilt Math Professor = Jonathan=20 David Farley wrote a clever little article titled Why = They Hate=20 America - in Britain, and so this equally clever-titled = response is=20 similarly designated. Since Professor Farley was kind enough to=20 superimpose the views of a select group of individuals [Oxford = students]=20 on a whole nation [England,] it seems meet to superimpose the = views of=20 everyone in my living room [Mrs. Goldberg and several small = children,]=20 on this nation.

Click here, = and take=20 a good look at the man, and who is in the picture with him. I'm = talking=20 about Marxist revolutionary Ernesto 'Che' Guevarra [the other = guy is=20 Farley.] That Vanderbilt allows this type of political statement = may=20 come as a surprise to some, but shouldn't. Vandy is simply = putting in=20 the open what most people know in their hearts - that America's = entire=20 educational system can be summed up by this one picture, taken = from a=20 faculty biography page on a major American university's website. = Farley's is, in essence, an official position supported by the = school.=20

In=20 reply to a citizen who wrote Vanderbilt complaining of the 'art' = in=20 Farley's picture, Vandy stated that they allow their professors = to make=20 whatever statements they wish without interference. But do we = really=20 think a professor posing with Hitler as backdrop would even make = it back=20 from the photo studio to his office in time to retrieve the = contents of=20 his desk before his dean had it emptied and burned? Don't be = silly.=20 Vanderbilt...Farley...Che Guevarra - they all go together = nicely.=20

Get=20 used to it.

The=20 aforementioned Oxford geniuses can't imagine why we were a = little upset=20 at having two skyscrapers knocked down with 3,000 people in = them. They=20 think we should exercise 'restraint,' and wonder to where our = 'moral=20 leadership' has gone off. Well, in one sense, they're = right...for if we=20 had true moral leadership, we'd have taken every step necessary = to=20 protect our citizens, including expelling from our midst each = and every=20 foreigner from every country known to support terrorism. But = England=20 left its sanity behind much longer ago than we did, and to = demand from=20 us that which their own Tony Blair cannot deliver is the height = of gall.=20

But=20 there are other reasons to hate Jonathan Farley in my = livin...er, in=20 America. Farley is undeniably racist against whites, but for a = black=20 man, this is fashionable and acceptable. As a demonstration of = his=20 bigotry and hatred, Farley exposes his complete ignorance of = history in=20 his recent Tennessean editorial, in which he likens the South's=20 Confederate heroes to the Nazis, and states that "the = Confederacy aimed=20 to destroy the United States." Were such the case, Lincoln would = have=20 been dead much sooner, and the White House burned to the ground, = as=20 Washington DC was left unprotected from Lee's Army most of the = time. The=20 South wanted nothing of destroying the United States, but to be = left=20 alone [a conclusion which a seventh-grader with a set of World = Book=20 encyclopedias should be able to draw.]

And=20 now Southerners still want to be left alone...by the Farleys of = the=20 world. And there are plenty of them. The entire parade of human = refuse=20 from the 60's has moved into all the positions of power, = influence, and=20 trust. As David Carr at Samizdata once wrote, "The fiery = radicals of=20 yesteryear became the outreach workers, counsellors [sic,] = legal-aid=20 lawyers, community activists, environmental campaigners, = journalists,=20 professors, social workers, teachers and union delegates. Carlos = the=20 Jackal became Charles the Educator and he lives next door to us = now. He=20 wears a well-tailored suit, expensive shoes, drives a car, sends = his=20 kids to private schools and writes a column in the Guardian..." = To that=20 I would add they are training the Farleys in their footsteps. =

Real=20 Americans, who have not yet bowed to the golden calf, reject = Farley and=20 his fellow travelers. We hate everything they stand for [ and = the word=20 hate is in the Bible, so get over it.] We will fight against = their ideas=20 until they are shamed out of existence. In a more civilised era, = their=20 treason would be dealt with by rope...we, being modern and 'with = it,'=20 will settle for a paradigm shift.

Some=20 of Jonathan David Farley's other articles:

Where=20 next - Alabama?
Remnants=20 of the Confederacy glorifying a time of tyranny=20

Your=20 comments and questions are encouraged. [editor@patriotist.com]

[top]=20 [bac= k=20 to archives main page] [home]=


Originally=20 posted from 11-24-02 to 12-01-02
Data=20 Strike!

by Jeffrey Quick

Well, = they did it.=20 The Senate rammed through the whole Homeland Security bill, = domestic=20 spying and all. The opposition was too little and too late. And = even=20 now, it's too little. Somebody sent me this on a list I'm on, = from the=20 ACLU:

To learn more=20 about this initiative and what you can do to defend your = right to=20 privacy, please click=20 here.

Oh yeah, = send a free=20 fax to President Bush. That's the ticket. "Please Massa, don' = spy on=20 me!" How about $3 in dimes to every Senator who voted for it? At = least=20 it would make the Post Office work.

Well, we = certainly=20 didn't get any help from the Democrats, who couldn't get beyond, = "But=20 the Republicans have filled this with pork" (which is basically = what the=20 Republicans were accusing the Democrats of, pre-election), and = were only=20 too happy to vote for the stinking mess. In fact it was a = conservative=20 (Safire) who blew the whistle on Poindexter's Peek 'n' = Pry.

Let's = look at who=20 has created the working guts of Total Information Awareness = (TIA). If=20 the government were to put together such a data system from = scratch,=20 they'd fall on their faces. Government has seldom if ever = created=20 anything really effective on its own. But private enterprise has = already=20 done the heavy lifting for them; all they have to do is tap in. = And the=20 IG Farbens of dem Amerikanischen Reich (scumbags like Larry = Ellison)=20 will be only too happy to help. Unless we give them an incentive = not=20 to.

What I = am proposing=20 is a data strike....something that really should have happened = years=20 ago, but which must happen now. This strike can consist of = several "job=20 actions", which people can participate in as they feel able. = Here are=20 some concrete ideas:

1. No = more=20 customer cards.

Store = customer=20 cards are one of the most gratuitous forms of data mining. If = you have=20 a card, shred it and send them the bits, and a letter telling = them=20 that you are protecting your data from the Office of = Information=20 Awareness. If you don't have a card, quit patronizing stores = that=20 offer them...and send them a letter telling them why. Of = course,=20 stores that require cards (warehouse clubs) are right out. If = one=20 wants to be a real activist about this, one can stand near = stores and=20 pass out flyers encouraging the people to strike.

2. = Minimal credit=20 card use

If = possible, don't=20 use credit cards at all. If enough people deal in cash, not = only will=20 banks lose cash flow, but the government will have to print = more of=20 it, or see the money supply contract, which is bad for = business. A=20 further advantage would be to reduce personal debt and thus = increase=20 personal freedom. Much credit card usage comes from laziness; = it's=20 easier to slip the plastic into the gas pump than to come in = and pay=20 the cashier. I am sympathetic to the need for credit cards in = online=20 transactions. But there are sometimes ways around direct use = of cards=20 (PayPal, eGold). And if the strike impacts Amazon et al, so = much the=20 better. An additional twist to the cash strategy would be to = stamp all=20 your paper money with a slogan such as "spent to avoid Total=20 Information Awareness". Or paste informational ("Simon = Jester")=20 stickers on gas pumps.

One = possible=20 government response to this might be to phase out cash so that = one=20 MUST use an electronic system. If this happens, I might just=20 re-evaluate my religious affiliation, because the Mark of the = Beast=20 will be here.

3. Use = encryption.

People = have been=20 resistant to this for awhile, partly because it hasn't been an = AOL/WebTV kind of tech, partly because they figure they will = make=20 themselves a suspect by using it. Well, we're all suspects = already, so=20 we'd might as well act like it. If more people use encryption, = it will=20 no longer arouse suspicion. For that matter, one could send = encrypted=20 Spam to government offices, just to confuse=20 people.

The Left = has been=20 saying for years that the multinational corporations call the = shots.=20 Here's a chance to put the theory to the test. If enough people = withhold=20 their money from data-mining companies, they will fight to keep = the=20 government out of their data, or perhaps stop collecting it at=20 all.

[top]=20 [bac= k=20 to archives main page] [home]=


Originally posted from 10-13-02 to = 11-07-02
Chet Rollins' = Dixie=20
by Lewis J. Goldberg =

Chet Rollins, a Baton = Rouge=20 writer for TheInsiders.=20 com [an LSU publication] on 9 October penned an article = entitled <= I>Dixie=20 has no place in Death Valley. Having never been to LSU, or=20 Louisiana, for that matter, I am having a hard time figuring out = what=20 Death Valley has to do with Dixie [having been raised in = Southern=20 California, the only Death Valley of which I know is far away = from the=20 deep South.] Besides that point, due to my ignorance, there is = much to=20 critique in Mr. Rollins screed. And while he fends off any = attempt at=20 response from the inevitable "great chorus of rednecks, " I = cannot, in=20 good conscience, allow Mr. Rollins lies and stupidity to stand=20 unanswered. Since Mr. Rollins admonishes respondents to write = with=20 "cogent thought and lucid, intelligible language, " I will go = one step=20 further and try to keep the number of syllables down for him, as = well.=20

For=20 purposes of introduction, this redneck works in the high = tech=20 industry as a consultant, has six children [all of whom are = well-fed,=20 adequately clothed and shod,] and cares enough about their = education to=20 do it at home [whilst simultaneously paying the taxes to school = other=20 people's children.] This redneck has been writing political = commentary=20 for almost four years, and has been published in a number of = commentary=20 websites and a couple of magazines. This redneck has been around = long=20 enough to figure out that there are more righteous men wearing = greasy=20 coveralls than business suits.. .don't know why that is, but the = observation bears out well. This redneck wears the label proudly = - it is=20 the highest complement in light of most of the alternatives. =

From=20 the first sentence, Mr. Rollins establishes that his article is = based=20 upon personal sentiment and emotions, rather than the facts of = history.=20 Mr. Rollins places not a shred of historical evidence in his = work, which=20 is, in essence, a critique of history itself. He would not dare = break=20 the spine on a book of true record, instead relying on the mush = he has=20 been fed through the prevailing culture of Lincolnolatry, which = seeps=20 into the brains of our children through television, radio, print = media,=20 and the popular maxims and folk sayings of an imprisoned and = conquered=20 people.

The=20 tune of Dixie is neither an "horrid screech" nor a = reveling in=20 the "darkest, most evil chapter in this great country's = history." It is=20 a reveling in the same spirit of freedom that won this country's = independence from Britain, and if Mr. Rollins enjoys the = freedoms=20 secured by the veterans of WWI, WWII, Korea, Viet-Nam, and the = latest=20 conflicts, he might check the home states of those veterans...he = may be=20 surprised to find out that the Sons of the South overwhelmingly = turned=20 out to made it possible for him to comfortably watch LSU = football whilst=20 imbibing enough lager to float the QE-II [note: I know nothing = of Mr.=20 Rollins' drinking habits, but it seemed a clever phrase...] =

Mr.=20 Rollins expresses gratitude for LSU's shedding of its "curious = and=20 macabre preoccupation ... with romanticizing the institution of=20 slavery," yet fails to make the case that such is what they were = ever=20 trying to do. Mr. Rollins, you cannot make it so just by writing = the=20 words. Do today's post-9/11 flag wavers engage in a curious and = macabre=20 romaticization of the institution of Indian Massacre? If not, = then why=20 do you make the same connection for Southern sympathisers? =

Mr.=20 Rollins next tries his hand at race baiting, wondering if the = white=20 athletes might feel "even a splinter of shame at Ole Miss when = Rebel=20 fans wave their cute, little rebel flag sticks, yelling, 'Go, = Rebels!'"=20 By this, he assumes that all people must think like he does, = else they=20 must suffer from defective consciences. Your self-righteous, = freebase=20 moralizing falls on tired, deaf ears, Mr. Rollins. If you want = to talk=20 facts and history, there's a thousand of us rednecks out here = waiting to=20 test your 'Civil War' smarts. My guess is you're too yellow to = take the=20 challenge. Why don't you talk your buddies at the LSU website = into=20 running a debate series between you and me...six articles, three = from=20 each of us - and I'll let you have the final word. What say ye? =

Mr.=20 Rollins states that he's glad he's not in the Land of Cotton, = which is a=20 good thing, because the Land of Cotton doesn't need him. He can = only see=20 a "plutocratic antebellum South, where the institution of = slavery=20 poisoned every aspect of culture," because he's too afraid to = look=20 beyond the brainwashing rhetoric and see the chains that were = forged for=20 his own bondage during, and in those years following, the War. = Mr.=20 Rollins only dares speak what he is allowed, else he would be = punished=20 by the 'polite society' he relies on for his artificial status. =

"At's=20 a good boy, Chet."

Arf.=20

[top]=20 [bac= k=20 to archives main page] [home]=


Originally posted from = 09-22-02 to=20 10-12-02
Let Us = Pray

by Jeffrey Quick=20

Liberty = has faced=20 dark times before. In 1940, during the Battle of Britain, the = witches of=20 England gathered, as they had for Bonaparte and for the Armada, = and=20 worked their spell, chanting "Can't cross the sea! Not able to = come!"=20 After that, the weather got bad for flying. Goering got stupid = and=20 rerouted the Luftwaffe from RAF bases (which they were close to = knocking=20 out ) to civilian targets, the German Naval Staff got cold feet, = and=20 Hitler decided to pick on his fellow mass-murderer Stalin = instead.=20 Coincidence?

In 1787 = as the=20 Constitutional Convention bogged down, Benjamin Franklin = suggested that=20 each session should open with a prayer, as had the Continental = Congress.=20 Hamilton said that the Convention was not in need of foreign = aid;=20 Williamson observed that there were no funds to pay a clergyman. = Only 4=20 of 55 delegates showed any interest, and the proposal was never = acted=20 on. We see now just how badly that Constitution has protected = our=20 liberties. Coincidence?

In 1918, = the English=20 magician Aleister Crowley had his students meditate on the = number 11.=20 The Armistice was signed on November 11 at 11 AM.=20 Coincidence?

All = creation begins=20 with thought, and thought in itself is creative. One can believe = in the=20 power of prayer, meditation, magick or whatever you wish to call = it,=20 without believing in a Higher Power, though many of us do. To = ignore the=20 spiritual dimension of the battle for liberty is to fight with = one hand=20 tied behind one's back. "For we wrestle not against flesh and = blood, but=20 against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of = the=20 darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high = places."=20 (Ephesians 6:12) It follows logically of course that to = only=20 focus on the spiritual dimension is also to fight with one hand = (and=20 both feet) tied behind one's back. But it is possible for = everyone to=20 set aside a regular time for prayer, without taking energy from = mundane=20 activism.

What to = create with=20 our thoughts and how to create it is a complex question. Those = of us who=20 accept the Non-Aggression Principle (and I hope all = readers here=20 do), will apply that to our prayer life, seeking as little harm = to=20 others as possible; visualizing colorful and fitting ways for = our=20 enemies to be smitten does not help us. Our work will be based = on what=20 we believe is possible; some of us think that it's too late to = work=20 within the system, that catastrophe is inevitable, and will pray = for a=20 soft landing. We should not specify the mechanism by which our = prayers=20 should be answered; the universe has possibilities beyond our = imagining,=20 and why should we limit it?

There = are people who=20 focus on praying for peace. Often their God is the guy who said, = "I came=20 not to send peace, but a sword."(Matthew 10:34) To pray for = peace=20 without freedom is to pray for exactly what the enemies of = freedom want.=20 As the neo-pagans say,"Be careful what you ask for; you might = get=20 it."

The best = reason for=20 a regular spiritual practice is to preserve your own sanity. = When the=20 cause appears hopeless, prayer affirms hope, either in the power = of your=20 own mind or in the power of God. Most religions believe that God = wants=20 us to live like God. And God, by definition, is not a = slave.

[top]=20 [bac= k=20 to archives main page] [home]=


Originally posted from = 07-24-02 to=20 08-01-02
A Modest Proposal = for Slave=20 Reparations

by Jeffrey Quick

OK, = accept that=20 we're going to have some form of reparations for the descendents = of=20 slaves. Not because their cause is just, but because American = thinking=20 has been thoroughly collectivized through the press and public = schools,=20 and because most Americans can't tell the difference between = paying off=20 living Japanese-Americans who survived government internment = camps and=20 paying off the multi-great-grandchildren of privately-owned = slaves with=20 the incomes of the multi-great-grandchildren of people who were = nowhere=20 near the scene of the crime. So how do we have reparations in a = way that=20 avoids race war and maximizes justice for all = concerned?

Black = slaves were=20 unjustly bought and sold by African slavers, unjustly and = cruelly=20 transported to this country, and unjustly deprived of the fruits = of=20 their labor. Any reparations program should deal with all of = these=20 injustices.

The last = is the easy=20 part, the part most reparations activists are fixated on. "Give = us 40=20 acres and a mule, or their cash equivalent". That was an = emergency=20 measure by General Sherman, and not an official government = promise. But=20 it's a talking point. They want 42 grand each; I have no problem = with=20 this, or even more, as long as all the injustices are=20 corrected.

One of = those was=20 bringing them to America to begin with, ripping them away from = their=20 culture. To make them whole requires returning them to Africa. = One of=20 the conditions of accepting any reparations settlement must be = to=20 renounce US citizenship for yourself and for any minor children, = and to=20 leave for Africa within 90 days of the check being cashed. Any = children=20 born in Africa would be eligible to immigrate under whatever = limits=20 currently apply, but former US citizens would be permanently=20 excluded.

The = advantages to=20 both America and Africa would be many. We'd be rid of a bunch of = whiners=20 who think that the world owes them something, while retaining = black=20 Americans who want to contribute to their country. The skills = and=20 capital of the =E9migr=E9s might go far to improve the economies = of the host=20 countries. $42,000 is 191 times the annual per capita gross = national=20 income of Burkina Faso. Even the average gangsta drop-out has = more=20 schooling than the typical African, and often has experience = retailing=20 agricultural commodities, and in free-market contract = enforcement. The=20 =E9migr=E9s might even foster democratic institutions, though = that's a more=20 questionable assumption; the difference between Jesse Jackson = and Robert=20 Mugabe is largely one of opportunity. The development of Africa = would=20 help foster world peace, and give us a reason to quit shipping = foreign=20 aid over there.

This = leaves us the=20 problem of how to pay for it, without creating a parallel = injustice to=20 those not responsible for slavery. Lo, the solution of the first = injustice solves this problem. Since there is no right to sell = human=20 beings, the Africans who sold their brothers into slavery took = the white=20 man's money under false pretenses, and owe us reparations for = having=20 cheated us. The coastal sub-Saharan countries from which most = slaves=20 were sent have many natural resources, and could be occupied and = looted=20 for several years, long enough to cover the slave reparations as = well as=20 reparations for tragedies subsequent to slavery (such as both = sides'=20 expenses in the War for Southern Independence, costs of race = riots,=20 etc.) It might be argued that the current inhabitants of those = countries=20 had nothing to do with the slave trade, but then, neither did = the=20 current US government. And it's our right, as a wronged race, to = collect=20 what we are owed. Isn't it?

[top]=20 [bac= k=20 to archives main page] [home]=


Originally posted from = 07-17-02 to=20 07-24-02
Pretending Not to=20 Notice

by=20 Louis J. = Goldberg

The = debate over=20 racism cannot be put to bed because the debate is inherently = dishonest.=20 Economics are at the heart of the racism issue, but not in the = way one=20 would think. We are told that racism causes poverty, yet it = would seem,=20 from a greater perspective, that the opposite is the case. = Racism tends=20 to be inflicted on those minorities who are in poverty and = spared from=20 those who are not. Case in point being Asians, who, in general, = arrive=20 in this country ready to apply themselves to get ahead as fast = as they=20 can. Their perspective is entirely different from native = minorities.=20 Escaping the bonds of affliction in the present tense gives one = a=20 tenacity for freedom when they get a shot at it, while those who = have=20 freedom from birth don't have the first idea what it can do, or = has done=20 for them.

The = predominant=20 liberal academic culture plays on the collective shame and guilt = of the=20 nation's mostly white Christian population. We don't like to be=20 perceived as being on the wrong side of social issues. Such an = image=20 presumably leads to lack of acceptance by conscientious peers, = which=20 thereby may limit career and social progression. The power of = shame and=20 guilt is such that it masks truth, preventing it from reaching = open=20 debate. Matters of truth are discounted out of hand, and the lie = becomes=20 policy.

Shame = and guilt mask=20 the truth behind so-called hate-crimes. When was the last time = someone=20 killed or assaulted someone they truly liked? All violent crimes = are=20 hate-based because they reflect a basic disdain for civility and = order.=20 In remembering an assault, which took place a few years ago, of = a white=20 couple and their son in front of a downtown restaurant, it was = not=20 billed as a hate crime, because in that case the law functioned = as it=20 ought to have. The perpetrators were brought to justice, which = is the=20 best result anyone could have expected. During that same month, = there=20 were other cases of violence, of the white-on-black variety, and = they=20 were immediately billed as a hate-crime. The media and judicial = circus=20 then kicked in, thereby ensuring that fair and impartial justice = would=20 not be served.

Shame = and guilt=20 cover up the reason that whites, in general [and Jesse Jackson, = in=20 particular,] fear black male youths walking down the street. = There is a=20 greater percentage of blacks in the prisons than whites [in = relation to=20 total population by race] because more blacks turn to crime to = solve=20 their problems, not because the police pick on them unfairly. = Racial=20 profiling stems from real police experience, not bigotry. A = police=20 officer would be incompetent if he did not apply previous = experience to=20 his police work.

Shame = and guilt=20 prevent us from confronting race-card dealers like The NAACP. = This=20 organisation, more than save perhaps Jesse Jackson's syndicate, = is=20 responsible for more racial strife and misery in the last decade = than=20 the last century of Klansmen. Outrageous statement, you say? = "Hey, like,=20 didn't the Klan lynch people, man?" Well, yes they did...maybe a = handful=20 in the early part of the last century. How many hundreds of = thousands of=20 blacks have died due to violence and drug addiction - the = product of=20 marginal lifestyles supported by the NAACP and other = organisations that=20 profit from keeping a good percentage of their people poor, = illiterate,=20 and stupid? I'd take my chances with the Klan, thank = you.

Our = nation's=20 government and institutions try to play along with the = feel-good,=20 multi-cultural rhetoric and policies that dominate public = discourse on=20 matters of race. Our elected representatives are committed to = this=20 strategy, despite the fact that it has never been shown to = improve race=20 relations for anybody, anywhere, at any time. In fact, the more=20 attention we call to race, the more racism we create. How can we = ever be=20 a color-blind society if we don't stop counting people by the = shade of=20 their hide? How can Dr. King's dream of his children being = 'judged by=20 the content of their character and not the color of their skin' = ever=20 occur if we avoid honest assessments of character when = discussing race=20 relations?

The best = and=20 brightest minds have worked to combat racism for the last 35 = years or=20 longer, all with little or no success. We can set up all the=20 'sensitivity training seminars' and 'race-relation task forces' = in the=20 world, but it will not make a bit of difference as long as = racism is=20 treated exclusively as a 'white problem.' People can and do = change, but=20 they have to be won over one at a time, and on an interpersonal = level.=20 That means that if black people want to be treated better by = employers,=20 police, and Denny's=99 managers, they need to present their best = image to=20 the public and work with their enslaved brothers to bring them = out of=20 their hatred for whites. Maybe some sensitivity training is = needed on=20 the other side?

Lewis = J. Goldberg=20 is an internet columnist and editor of The=20 Patriotist.

[top]=20 [bac= k=20 to archives main page] [home]=


Originally posted from = 05-24-02 to=20 05-30-02
On Pork=20 Patrol

by=20 DracoDei

I'm=20 chubby, and I know it. I have been so most of my life, including = in high=20 school when I played soccer, running my ass off chasing the ball = (not to=20 mention the daily practices, etc.) Even with all that = caloric-burning=20 exuberance I had a bit of a pot-belly, and was always soft on = the edges.=20 I've gotten a little older now, and admittedly am not in as good = a shape=20 as I was then.

I try to=20 eat right but it doesn't always happen. I also know that I need = to=20 exercise. I have the best intentions to lose weight and get in = shape,=20 but they haven't happened yet. And whose fault is it? Mine. Not=20 society's, not the food industry=92s, not anybody's fault but my = own.

My=20 employer - indeed, most full-time employers these days - have = fitness=20 centers for people who want to work out at lunch, or before or = after=20 work. Many employers have health fairs, devoted to giving = dietary and=20 other health-related advice. Healthy workers are better workers; = they=20 take fewer sick days, and though I don't know if there's proof, = I'd=20 suspect there's a study somewhere showing that a fit worker is = more=20 productive. But obesity lurks, fat nightmares stalk the streets = of our=20 communities, just waiting to pounce on unsuspecting persons = deciding to=20 finish off the last french fry or contemplating dessert. To save = me from=20 this horrible nightmare, anti-fat crusaders want to reach into = my life=20 to make sure I do what they know is best for me. After all, = we're in an=20 "obesity crisis", an epidemic of porkers, pot-bellies, and = cellulite=20 thighs.

We know=20 this because of a new method of calculation, called the Body = Mass=20 Indicator (BMI) released in 1998. This method of calculation has = resulted in making "...30 million Americans fat overnight," = according to=20 Mike Burita of The Center for Consumer Freedom. But the = newfangled=20 obesity crisis is caused by a standard few can meet. Burita adds = that=20 the BMI is so misleading that actors like Russell Crowe and Tom = Cruise=20 are considered obese, while sports stars Cal Ripken Jr. and = Michael=20 Jordan are classified overweight. But because of the = =93crisis=94, doctors=20 and others who are concerned about this alleged epidemic have = decided=20 they must take action for my own good, and are planning to=20 act.

Because=20 being overweight is a health issue, there are calls for adding a = "fat=20 tax" to foods they deem unworthy. They want to see soda machines = ripped=20 from their locations, menus downsized rather than supersized, = and some=20 have even proposed making sure exercise walkways and other = things are=20 built into communities. This is the issue of the day, the = rescuing of=20 the fattening America.

But there=20 is a deeper issue - the for-your-own-gooders completely miss the = fact=20 that most problems are a matter of personal responsibility. If I = fail to=20 exercise, eat right, etc., I accept the greater health risk. = That's my=20 choice. Nobody forces me to have a bacon double cheeseburger or = to=20 finish the piled-high portion at a restaurant. Nobody bars me = from the=20 exercise room. I'm sick and tired of do-gooders constantly on = the=20 lookout to protect me from myself.

Heaven=20 forbid I make that decision the wrong way! After all, if I = choose poorly=20 there is a chance that the public might be forced to spend more = money;=20 thus is the basis for intrusion into my life formed. And this = rationale=20 is truly insidious, for there are few things not touched by it.=20 Overweight? Let=92s enact =93fat taxes=94 and other incentives = to make sure=20 people eat better. Coming soon: mandated diets and = doctor-approved and=20 supervised exercise plans. Too tired due to lack of sleep? = Monitored=20 sleep periods to make sure you get the requisite eight hours, = and=20 enforced nap times besides (wait, come to think of it, I might = go for=20 this one). Even sex would not be immune, for the =93Protection = Police=94=20 would be authorized to check to make sure you and partner are = properly=20 equipped. After all, diseases or unwanted children could cost = public=20 money!

Some will=20 laugh at my examples, but only a few years ago the idea of a = "fat tax"=20 topped the giggle scale. And there will doubtless be more to = come. The=20 for-your-own-good nazis will never stop, for they justify their=20 anti-freedom lunacy with the noblest of intentions, soothed by = their own=20 conscience that their unprecedented - and likely unending - = meddling=20 with peoples' lives is the right thing to do, freedom and = personal=20 responsibility be damned.

[top]=20 [bac= k=20 to archives main page] [home]=


Originally posted = from=20 05-16-02 to 05-24-02
Chief Wahoo on the = Trail of=20 Tears?
by=20 Jeffrey Quick

On April=20 30, the Anaheim Angels slaughtered the Cleveland Indians 21-2. = The next=20 day, I read that the legislature of the People's Republic of = California=20 is considering a bill to ban mascots and team names deemed = derogatory to=20 any racial or ethnic group from all K-12 schools and colleges = (click here for the story). While the bill = would not=20 affect professional teams, it's still interesting = timing.

And it=20 suggests a thought: the real problem behind Native American = names of=20 sports teams is not that they are ethnically insulting, but that = they=20 idealize Indians as some kind of big fierce savage unbeatable = fighting=20 machine. I mean, come on, the Indians got creamed. Not even the = Jews or=20 blacks were so thoroughly subjugated. And with both the = Cleveland=20 Indians and Atlanta Braves in freefall, it might be time for = baseball to=20 embrace the true reality of native life.

We can=20 start with promotions. Why not offer free blankets and smallpox=20 vaccinations to the first 1000 purchasers of season tickets? (I = mean we=20 can't offer the smallpox on the blankets... there are terrorists = out=20 there.) Or genuine Sand Creek-style tobacco pouches for dipping = snuff.=20 Let's redo Chief Wahoo's teeth, to reflect the change from a=20 hunter-gatherer diet to the crappy sugar and starch meals on the = rez. A=20 couple nice black cavities ought to do it. Maybe a antique = Gatling gun=20 in the Atlanta stadium to hose down the fans when they start = that=20 tomahawk chop. After all, it's what we did the last = time.

And let's=20 redo the concessions. Why is it you can't get a good chunk of = pemmican=20 or bowl of succotash in any major-league ballpark? Hell, you = can't even=20 get fry bread. Get rid of that yuppie food like sushi. And = forget beer.=20 What chief ever traded land for beer? Good cheap rotgut whiskey, = that's=20 the stuff, with fans puking all over each other and being even = more=20 abusive than they are now. Anything that encourages fan = alcoholism will=20 foster identification with the team mascot.

Let's=20 change the names of some of the other teams. We can leave the = Yankees=20 and the Mariners alone; they did their part to kill Indians. But = the=20 National League really needs help. The Cincinnati Custers, the=20 Pittsburgh Firewater, the Montreal Mounties could all keep the = Braves in=20 their place.Get rid of modern technological safety equipment. = Make the=20 batters swing wearing a Plains war bonnet. Let the guy with the = highest=20 batting average call the pitches. Let the strategy of the game = reflect=20 the strategies of the Indian wars. And ditch the organ and = accompany the=20 national anthem with a drum.

If the=20 Indian teams do their best to act like Indians, they'll lose = like=20 Indians. And when fans realize that Indians are losers, they'll = desert=20 their teams. The owners will have to switch names and image = voluntarily,=20 without government coercion, not because it's politically = correct, but=20 because nobody wants to be on a losing team. And the Atlanta = Shermans=20 will again claim their place in the sun.

[top]=20 [bac= k=20 to archives main page] [home]=


Originally posted from = 04-26-02 to=20 05-03-02
An Open Letter to = Elton=20 John

from=20 Morgan = Freeberg

My dear=20 Sir Elton John,

Congratulations on a = successful=20 appearance on your part, by all accounts, before my United = States Senate=20 last week, during which you demanded=20 "the richest nation" immediately end the AIDS = epidemic.

I=92d like=20 to discuss with you your purpose in doing this, whether it was = to make=20 impassioned arguments that would resonate with the American = people, or=20 force our hands by using your celebrity status to pressure our=20 lawmakers. You appear to have thought you were meeting with a = slice of=20 Americana under the Capitol Dome. Nothing could be further from = the=20 truth. Generally, when a senator is re-elected, he has convinced = his=20 constituents that their problems are caused by some among the = other=20 ninety-nine senators; he himself is blameless. We have a tough = time=20 relating to senators. No senator has successfully completed a=20 presidential election campaign since 1968.

No, you=20 did not see Americana at our nation=92s capitol. Americana is = what you are=20 reading now. If you are interested in explaining to us why we = should=20 spend more money on AIDS, instead of simply forcing us to do so, = you=20 should keep reading.

America=20 is the most generous nation on earth. We believe in charity by = choice,=20 not by mandate. To our way of thinking, the height of human = existence is=20 to willingly sacrifice what we have salted away, to help someone = less=20 fortunate. Simultaneously, the nadir of human failure is to = require such=20 a thing through statute. To Americans, charity is voluntary, or = it is=20 nothing.

Must we=20 prove our generosity? While Ground Zero was burning in = Manhattan,=20 America flew over to the country from where the attack = originated, and=20 dropped =96 food! Food and money! Have you ever heard the like? = If I were=20 you, I wouldn=92t bother checking English history for a=20 precedent.

To your=20 credit, before asking us to eradicate AIDS, you established a = $35=20 million foundation to do likewise. Some American celebrities = could learn=20 a thing or two from this. I respect that. At the same time, = examples=20 abound of your penchant for lavish and frivolous spending. They = are not=20 consistent with someone overly concerned about funding a health = crisis:=20 =A3293,000 for flowers, =A3357,353 for a picture, =A3120,000 for = your own=20 birthday. "I could find a shop in the Sahara desert," you = boasted in a=20 BBC=20 Times article.

When you=20 sued your former manager and accountants a year-and-a-half ago, = it was=20 revealed that you whittled through $43 million in 20 months from = 1996 to=20 1997. That works out to half a million every week of lavish, = needless,=20 excessive personal spending. You seem to be cognizant that this = is your=20 right. You were quoted = as saying, "I have no one to leave the money to. I'm a single = man. I=20 like spending my money."

Sir=20 Elton, the spirit of America champions your defiant defense. It = is the=20 one place on earth where such an argument will enjoy the = greatest=20 momentum. In our culture, individual choice is what life is all = about.=20 People here are expected to prosper and to suffer from the = efforts they=20 put out, and the decisions that they make.

My beef=20 with you concerns your inconsistency. You emerged from your = mountain of=20 clothes, jewels, flowers =96 and lawsuits you started once you = belatedly=20 realized your purse was getting light. Living large by personal = choice,=20 you came to the place where personal choice is most-treasured, = and=20 evacuated your bowels on that concept of personal choice. You = infer we=20 have these obligations because we=92re so "rich," "nobody else = comes=20 close," etc. Well, that offends the hell out of me.

Where is=20 all this money? Our state governments are, with few exceptions, = awash in=20 red ink year after year. Our federal government would be = bankrupt, were=20 it not exempt from accounting standards incumbent on everyone = else. Some=20 say if you want to get technical about it, our country has been=20 voluntarily bankrupt since March 9, 1933.

Do our=20 richest citizens possess this money? We have the most generous = rich=20 people on the planet. They set up foundations just like you do. = They=20 donate to AIDS research, Cancer research, at-risk youth = programs. They=20 "gave at the office," as it were. Do you know of any wealthy = Americans=20 who do not contribute to charity? Point them out. I=92d be = interested in=20 seeing such a "miser" list, but I doubt it will be very = long.

I hope=20 you don=92t have the cojones to infer that this wealth is in the = standard-of-living of our more modest citizens. If you do, I = must be=20 part of this; there are more Americans making less than me, than = those=20 who make more. My head spins when I compare my weekly personal = expenses=20 to your $537 thousand. What I spent in the seven days before you = showed=20 up at my nation=92s capitol, is dwarfed by your own weekly = budget by a=20 factor of, oh, where=92s my calculator =96 Twenty-Three Thousand = Six Hundred=20 Fifty-Eight Times! No flowers or pictures that week. A little = gas to get=20 to work, some Kleenex and eye-drops, a co-pay for my doctor=92s = visit,=20 that=92s about it.

America=20 spends enough money on AIDS, as it is, to match 500 Elton John = clones=20 shopping 'til they drop. On a per-patient basis, that blows all = other=20 disease research away. I believe more lives could be saved, not = with=20 more cash, but with better oversight from your new friends in = the Senate=20 regarding where=20 the money goes. Seminars on masturbation, flirting classes = for gay=20 men, tickets to Disneyland, luxurious hotel rooms at $329 apiece = =96 it=20 sounds more like a page from Elton John=92s diary than = extirpation of an=20 epidemic.

Your=20 speech came days before American tax returns were due. Could you = enlighten me on the mindset? Brighter = minds=20 than mine have already pounced on you for spending half a mil a = week on=20 bull-squeeze, boasting about it, and then haughtily intoning to = my=20 country that it=92s our job to end AIDS because we=92re rich. = Did you not=20 see the criticism coming or did you simply not care?

Regards,
Morgan K=20 Freeberg
AMERICAN TAXPAYER

[top]=20 [bac= k=20 to archives main page] [home]=


Originally posted from = 04-19-02 to=20 04-26-02
Witch Hunt=20 2002

by Jeffrey Quick

I and my = sweetie,=20 She Who Is Not Fooled (SWINF), were discussing the latest loca= l=20 eruption of the Catholic sexual abuse scandal. A priest was = put on=20 furlough because he was accused of giving a 12-year old a bare = bottom=20 spanking, even though he wasn't even serving in that parish in = that=20 year. I don't think spanking is a priestly function, myself. But = officials of my public school were giving out bare-bottom = spankings in=20 the 60s, and nobody considered it sexual abuse then. And anyone = now who=20 thinks that corporal punishment of children is a sexual act is = twisted=20 beyond any help.

"But = what about this=20 one?" I asked. "This woman said she was spanked for something = she said=20 in confession, when she was in her early 20s. That's not = discipline;=20 that's kink."

"A 20 = year old=20 let herself be spanked?!" SWINF said. "That's consensual. = Or more=20 likely, she's just nuts, and wants her 15 minutes of fame." = Later in the=20 day, I read about accusations in LA, brought by a paranoid=20 schizophrenic, and knew she was right, and Hell was out for=20 recess.

As a = Wiccan, I must=20 admit to a touch of Schadenfreud that the sponsors of Sprenger = and=20 Kramer are getting a dose of their own medicine. But witch hunts = are=20 destructive and wrong, no matter whose foot the shoe is on. The = gay=20 community may be breathing a little easier now that it seems = that not=20 all priestly pedophiles are queer. Still, mass hysteria is=20 unpredictable, and nobody knows where this generation's version = of the=20 McMartin=20 Preschool case will lead.

But it = might be=20 worth asking "Qui bono?" and "Why now?" It's not like priests = have=20 suddenly developed itches in their britches, after all. They've = been=20 regularly falling from grace for two millennia, and the Church, = like any=20 other major political institution, has always engaged in damage = control.=20 Granted, that's not moral leadership, but it's to be=20 expected.

In the = Satanic=20 ritual abuse scandals of the 80s, it was the Evangelical Right = and=20 psychologists with dubious theories who were the pushers and = chief=20 beneficiaries of the myth. The goal was to defame the newly = resurgent=20 and competitive pagan religions, as well as scaring mothers away = from=20 rejoining the workforce and keeping them home with the kids. = There was=20 also fame, money and glory for a few Christian hucksters, of = which the=20 most notorious was Mike=20 Warnke, finally exposed as a fraud by his own = co-religionists. In=20 this round of scandal, the chief agents seem to be the news = media and=20 trial lawyers, both practically arms of the Democratic Party.=20

How does = the Left=20 benefit from damaging the Catholic church? Painting the church = as a=20 dangerous place for children drives a further wedge between = ethnic=20 Catholics (who traditionally vote Democratic but have been = drifting=20 right) and the Church which has been leading them Right, largely = through=20 the abortion issue. But more importantly, the Church is a threat = to the=20 New World Order, in spite of the Marxism which infects it, = because it is=20 a separate power base. John Paul II is to the Church what Reagan = was to=20 America: one who put the brakes on the downward spiral and = pulled the=20 organization back to traditional values, through force of = charisma and=20 will. In either case, it may have been too little, too late, but = it has=20 definitely thrown off the timetable. And now that the old Pole = is too=20 feeble to boldly combat the scandal, there's an opportunity for = the Left=20 to influence the church. It would be interesting to analyze the = politics=20 of those priests and bishops who have been discredited or driven = from=20 office, in comparison to those of the church as a whole, and the = effect=20 on the next conclave.

"Do you = think this=20 will bring down the Church?" SWINF asked me. No. An egregore = that old=20 and central to Western civilization isn't going to just blow = away. Even=20 financially, the wealth of the Church is the wealth of its = believers,=20 and largely beyond lawyers' grasp. And the legal reasoning = behind making=20 the Pope a defendant in a civil suit is tenuous at best, and the = burden=20 of proof near-insurmountable. These nuisance suits and scandals = are=20 distractions. The Left is too smart to fight the church head-on. = All=20 they need to do is weaken it enough to grab temporal power; = after that=20 it will be largely irrelevant to their design. While it's clear = that the=20 Church should make amends in the cases where it enabled abuse, = it must=20 resist bending over. And no matter how deep our contempt for = religion=20 might be, there's no point in scapegoating the = priesthood.

[top]=20 [bac= k=20 to archives main page] [home]=


Originally posted from = 04-09-02 to=20 04-19-02
Andrea Yates and = the=20 Legally-Mandated Calgon Moment

by Morgan = Freeberg

Unless = my eyes and=20 ears deceive me, Andrea Yates is back in the news again. She's = locked up=20 for life, but now we have to figure out how culpable her = husband,=20 Russell, is in the deaths of their five children. The ones she = held=20 underwater with her own two hands until they all = drowned.

I don't = understand=20 how this is possible. I thought we lived in a culture that = despises=20 excessive news coverage. Three years later, my ears still ring = from=20 "censure and move on!" Poll after poll, I was told, revealed = that we=20 didn't care if the President lied to us and was ready to lie to = us about=20 anything else that suited his purposes. News anchors = condescendingly=20 explained to me that current events, both domestic and foreign, = had only=20 a few minutes in the spotlight before people grew fatigued. = Blockbuster=20 awaited, after all. Triple-fudge frapaccinos were waiting to be = brewed,=20 sprinkled with vanilla flakes for $6.75 a cup. The real things = in life=20 mattered, and we were tired of the news.

Never = mind that by=20 consuming air-time to explain this to me, the anchors were = practically=20 contradicting themselves. I got the message: News is for nerds. = Why=20 then, three years hence, this perpetual thirst for more updates = on the=20 Yates chronicle?

Because = we're a=20 nation of selfish bastards, that's why.

Clinton = and Lewinsky=20 don't hit home; Yates does. Lazy, selfish men are waiting out = there to=20 see how much they can ignore the daily maintenance of their = young=20 children while their wives handle everything, before those men = are=20 criminally culpable. Self-pitying, teary-eyed women, weary of = keeping=20 the home fires burning like grandma used to do, want their = husbands to=20 pitch in and help - with the force of law. They want a = legally-mandated=20 Calgon moment. They want to say to him: If I'm stressed out, you = better=20 notice it and pitch in, pal. You are responsible for my sanity. = The=20 Russell Yates conviction, or lawsuit, proved it.

For = however little=20 it is worth, the men have a better case here. If a woman is on = the edge=20 of a nervous breakdown or is legally insane, and someone else is = responsible for her, that someone-else has to be as competent as = any of=20 the rest of us if not more so. People who have been through such = a=20 family crisis know this. They need to have both oars in the = water, to=20 make up for the other person's weakness. Russell may be a lot of = things,=20 but he is not that. I've followed the case as close as anyone = else. He's=20 a matchstick short of a cord.

Are we = really to=20 believe that impregnating your wife time after time after time, = against=20 a doctor's advice, is evidence of negligence - and therefore = competence=20 - and then the extinguishing of those young lives is indicative = of=20 insanity, and therefore innocence? In John Marshall's words, = this is too=20 extravagant to be maintained.

Besides, = this is a=20 misguided and counterproductive way to rejuvenate the carcass of = feminism. Such a supervisory capacity would effectively make = every=20 husband his wife's boss. The teary-eyed bitchy women evidently = haven't=20 thought that all the way through. You put legal responsibilities = on=20 someone, you have to give them the authority to back that up. I = doubt=20 that's what they want to do.

But it = really=20 doesn't matter. Three years ago, the Lewinsky scandal was = universally=20 regarded of having overstayed its welcome. That is much more = true of the=20 Yates case, which is more important than many other domestic = tragedies=20 only because several of the spectators figure they have a stake = in=20
the outcome.

I say, a = pox on both=20 their houses, the men and the ladies. This is more selfishness = than our=20 society can stand for long. Somewhere out there, someone is = thinking "I=20 care more about stories that impact me, and people like me, than = stories=20 that impact how the entire nation is governed and affect the = lives of=20 millions of other people." And then there are millions of more = people,=20 who think like that person. This appears to be a value system = held by a=20 majority. If it lasts for long, we, as a free society, will=20 not.

[top]=20 [bac= k=20 to archives main page] [home]=



Originally = posted=20 from 03-14-02 to 03-24-02
Big Mother's Breasts = Give=20 Pasteurized Milk
by Jeffrey Quick=20

It's=20 contraband. Crack cocaine is easier to find. It's been fed to = children=20 for thousands of years, but it's too dangerous to give them now. = It's=20 milk. Raw milk.

Eww, = yuck. That=20 germy stuff. Why would anybody want to drink it? Raw milk has a = lot=20 going for it over store milk: enzymes, probiotic bacteria, = Vitamins B6,=20 and B-12, and an antistiffness factor, all of which are = destroyed by=20 heating. The Weston A. = Price=20 Foundation can tell you all about it. But those germs? Yes, = clean raw milk=20 has germs, but not dangerous ones. Just like clean = meat.

Even if = raw milk=20 were worse than pasteurized, you'd have a right to drink it, = right? I=20 mean, Twinkies aren't so good for you either, and they're legal. = Well,=20 Twinkies are a product of Big Business. And it's Big Business = that=20 agitated for pasteurization laws in the 1930s. Why? Pasteurized = milk=20 lasts longer. Raw milk contains lactobacilli (related to yogurt = culture)=20 and will sour and clabber, forming perfectly edible curds. = Pasteurized=20 milk just spoils and becomes undrinkable. Plus, since the milk = was to be=20 processed anyway, it was easier to add homogenization. Since the = cream=20 doesn't rise to the top in homo milk, the consumer can't tell = butterfat=20 content, which means that the legal 3.5% minimum for butterfat = is also=20 the de facto
maximum. This is great for farmers who raise = breeds=20 producing large amounts of watery milk. Also, they figure they = don't=20 have to be quite as careful about milkhouse cleanliness...even = though=20 most cases of milkborne disease come from pasteurized = milk.

A = summary of the=20 laws of the 50 states, Canada, and Britain can be found posted = at the Campaign for Real Milk = website on=20 its What's = Happening=20 with Real Milk? page.The good news (such as it is) is that = raw milk=20 is still legal in just over half of all states, but what that = means in=20 practice can be illustrated by the Ohio statute:

Ohio = Revised Code=20 =A7 917.04 Sale and labeling of raw milk

No raw = milk=20 retailer shall sell, offer for sale, or expose for sale raw = milk to=20 the ultimate consumer except a raw milk retailer who, prior to = October=20 31, 1965, was engaged continuously in the business of selling = or=20 offering for sale raw milk directly to ultimate consumers, = holds a=20 valid raw milk retailer license issued under section 917.09 of = the=20 Revised Code, and is subject to the rules regulating the sale = of raw=20 milk adopted under this chapter.

How = nice! There is=20 one such producer in Ohio, in Yellow Springs. And there's = no need=20 to issue new raw milk retailer licences, because under this = ordinance,=20 they wouldn't be allowed to sell anyway. And without a licence, = it's a=20 2nd degree misdemeanor the first time, a first degree = misdemeanor each=20 succeeding time, and each day counts as a separate = charge.

Federal=20 law states:

Uniformity and=20 adequacy of State milk production regulations is obtained = through a=20 model Pasteurized Milk Ordinance (PMO) developed and revised = under FDA=20 leadership. The PMO is the basis for the milk sanitation laws = and=20 regulations of 49 States, the District of Columbia, and over = 2,000=20 local communities.

This is = SOP for=20 bureaucrats who want to override the 10th Amendment: design a = model=20 ordinance and then use some combination of carrot and stick to = get local=20 jurisdictions to adopt it:

Pasteurization is=20 mandatory for all milk and milk products, in final package = form,=20 intended for direct human consumption after distribution in = interstate=20 commerce. The regulation (21 CFR 1240.61) defines = pasteurization as=20 heating and holding every particle of milk or milk product in = properly=20 designed and operated equipment at times and temperatures = specified in=20 the regulation. Exemptions are provided for acceptable = alternative=20 methods, such as the aging of certain = cheeses.

This ban = on raw milk=20 in interstate commerce was instituted by executive order of Mr. = Limited=20 Government, President Ronald Reagan.

People = who wish to=20 buy and sell raw milk have tried doing runs around the law. The = most=20 common is for the farm to sell the cows or shares thereof to the = customers. It is legal to milk your own cow and drink the = milk.=20 But The State inflicts its usual warped views of ownership here = too. For=20 an example of persecution in Wisconsin, read the story told by = Midvalleyvu=20 Farms.

The = other path is to=20 fight legislatively. The Campaign for=20 Real Milk, patterned after Britain's successful Campaign for = Real=20 Ale, is the most visible such organization. RawMilk.org: A Right to Choose = Healthy=20 Food Site is another.

[top]=20 [bac= k=20 to archives main page] [home]=